This demo uses sample data — nothing you see here is from your team. Your real dashboard will be built from your own Figma activity and will adapt to your team structure and patterns.

The numbers and insights below are anonymised examples to show the kind of view you get after upload.

Back to homeGet your own dashboard

FlowStatus demo

Sign up

Design Efficiency

72.0%

DE% = 0.4 × Speed + 0.3 × Focus + 0.3 × Momentum

Most teams sit between 60–75%.

68.0

Speed

Project duration distribution

DurationProjects
Quick (under 15 days)5
Medium (15-60 days)10
Long (over 60 days)3

3 projects running long

View projects →
74.0

Focus

Projects per designer per day

AttentionDesigners
Focused (1-2 projects)12
Busy (3-4 projects)8
Scattered (5+ projects)4

4 designers spread thin

View people →
70.0

Momentum

Work pattern consistency

Activity typeProjects
Steady (continuous work)8
Gaps (intermittent)6
Spikey (stop-start)4

4 projects with irregular activity

View projects →
Projects18
Active: 15 · Dormant: 3
Files156
Core Designers24
Data coverage
2024-07-01 – 2024-10-15

More efficiency depth

Avg Project Complexity

Very Simple
Very Complex
58.0
Complex
Projects vs. Norms
Files (norm: 2)
↓5●10↑3
Actions (norm: 800)
↓4●12↑2
Duration (norm: 28d)
↓6●8↑4
People (norm: 4)
↓7●10↑1
↓ below norm ● normal ↑ above norm

People per Project

5.2
average
Good (4-8)

Projects per Person

3.5
average
Good (1-4 for designers)

Project Activity Status

Dormant Projects3 (18.0%)
Active Projects15 (82.0%)
Avg Dormancy Periods
1.2
per project
Avg Active Periods
2.1
per project

Rounds of change activity

4.2
avg per project
Iterative — good collaboration/refinement
Projects by iteration level
Low
5
Medium
9
High
4

Signals of sustained intensity

Work pattern signals; not a measure of wellbeing or clinical risk.
View Details →
2
designers with sustained intensity signals
8.3% of 24 total users
8.3%
91.7%
Signals detected
2 (8.3%)
Medium signals
2
No signals
22 (91.7%)
How is this calculated?

Signals we analyze:

  • High project switching (frequent context changes between projects)
  • Above-average action counts (working at high intensity)
  • High ratio of projects to designers (overloaded teams)
  • Elevated daily activity levels

What no signals looks like:

Designers working on a manageable number of projects with consistent focus, balanced workload, and sustainable activity patterns.

Important note:

Work pattern signals only; not a measure of wellbeing or clinical risk. These patterns may indicate sustained intensity. The best way to understand team wellbeing is to check in directly with your designers.

Design Efficiency Insights

72/100

Design efficiency is in a good range. Speed and momentum are improving; focus is strong. Avg project duration: 42 days.

Key Findings

Focus and momentum in range
Average focus (74) and momentum (70) indicate sustained attention and consistent progress.
Impact: Supports delivery predictability.
Low iteration cycles on some projects
A subset of projects shows fewer than 4 iteration rounds for their length.
Impact: May indicate unclear briefs or late feedback.

Discussion Points

3 project(s) >60 days
Unblock or reprioritise?
4 designer(s) touched 5+ projects/day
Context-switching risk — rebalance?
2 designer(s) on >5 projects
Rebalance load?
3 dormant project(s)
Resume, archive, or reallocate?
2 slow project(s)
Review bottlenecks?
2 project(s) with <30% momentum
Discuss consistency

License Optimization

View details →

Candidates for license review — requires manager verification.

Minimal Users
3
<10 events (estimate)
Very Minimal
1
<5 events
Seats not seen 6+ weeks
4
Potential Annual Savings
£480
Range: £360 – £600
Total full/dev seats identified: 24
View details →

Team Composition

Seat breakdown per seat type (approximate)
Full18
Dev4
Viewer12
Time in Design Tools
All time in production tools (Figma, FigJam, Figma Make) is an indicator of the utility
485 hrs

Collaboration & Design Thinking Insights

72/100

Collaboration patterns are healthy overall. FigJam usage is consistent; one division shows lower collaboration density.

Key Findings

Strong design thinking usage
FigJam sessions account for 16% of activity with good multi-user participation.
Impact: Supports aligned ideation and shared understanding.
Lower collaboration density in Platform
Platform division has fewer people per project on average (4–5) and lower session frequency.
Impact: May benefit from more structured collaboration touchpoints.

Likely Levers

Likely lever:
Schedule regular FigJam kick-offs for Platform projects to align stakeholders early.

See your own design flow in minutes.

Build your dashboard

Upload Figma activity log